The stablecoin leader Tether has announced its plans to direct over $1 billion into the AI and biotechnology industries next year. This ambitious investment strategy was unveiled by Tether’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, signaling a significant shift in the company’s focus. Historically, Tether has diversified its portfolio, showing a strong interest in sectors beyond stablecoins, including
CoinOtag
You can visit the page to read the article.
Source: CoinOtag
Disclaimer: The opinion expressed here is not investment advice – it is provided for informational purposes only. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of BitMaden. Every investment and all trading involves risk, so you should always perform your own research prior to making decisions. We do not recommend investing money you cannot afford to lose.
Malaysia’s Prime Minister Champions Cryptocurrency Policy During Abu Dhabi Visit
Malaysia aims for a modern digital finance policy. The government seeks collaboration with leading global cryptocurrency players. Continue Reading: Malaysia’s Prime Minister Champions Cryptocurrency Policy During Abu Dhabi Visit The post Malaysia’s Prime Minister Champions Cryptocurrency Policy During Abu Dhabi Visit appeared first on COINTURK NEWS . CoinOtag
Gary Gensler: SEC Has Never Declared Bitcoin or Ethereum as Securities
Gary Gensler: SEC Has Never Declared Bitcoin or Ethereum as Securities In a recent Yahoo Finance interview , Gary Gensler , Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), clarified a long-standing misconception surrounding Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). Gensler stated that neither he nor his predecessor, Jay Clayton , had ever labeled Bitcoin or Ethereum as securities . Furthermore, Gensler noted that the SEC itself has refrained from definitively classifying these assets as securities, citing the commission’s mandate and the unique characteristics of these tokens. What Did Gensler Say? Bitcoin and Ethereum’s Status Gensler emphasized that the SEC has never declared Bitcoin or Ethereum as securities . He explained that the nature of the SEC’s work prevents the commission from definitively classifying these tokens as securities. Historical Context Gensler pointed out that investors had access to Bitcoin and Ethereum long before exchange-traded fund (ETF) products involving these assets were launched. This highlights their decentralized origins and their adoption as non-securities by market participants. Why Bitcoin and Ethereum Are Treated Differently Bitcoin’s Decentralization Creation Without Issuers: Bitcoin was created through a decentralized process, with no central authority or initial coin offering (ICO). Global Consensus: Its decentralized nature has led regulators to treat it as a commodity rather than a security. Ethereum’s Evolution Initial Fundraising Questions: While Ethereum’s 2014 ICO sparked some initial scrutiny, its transition to a decentralized network has distanced it from traditional securities classifications. Regulatory Silence: The SEC’s lack of an official declaration on Ethereum reflects the complexity of applying securities laws to blockchain-based assets. Gensler’s Comments in Context Investor Misconceptions Gensler’s clarification comes amid ongoing debates about the classification of cryptocurrencies and regulatory oversight. His statement aims to dispel the notion that the SEC has taken a definitive stance on Bitcoin or Ethereum as securities. SEC’s Mandate Case-by-Case Basis: The SEC evaluates assets individually to determine whether they meet the criteria of a security under the Howey Test . Non-Definitive Statements: Due to this approach, broad classifications of cryptocurrencies remain rare. Implications for Bitcoin and Ethereum Investors Regulatory Clarity Gensler’s remarks reaffirm that Bitcoin and Ethereum are unlikely to face regulatory challenges as securities, ensuring continued confidence among investors. Market Dynamics ETF Adoption: The approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs demonstrates their acceptance as legitimate investment assets. Institutional Interest: Continued regulatory ambiguity may slow institutional adoption for newer tokens but reassures confidence in Bitcoin and Ethereum. The Broader Debate on Crypto Regulation Other Cryptocurrencies Under Scrutiny While Bitcoin and Ethereum enjoy regulatory leeway, many altcoins face questions regarding their status as securities. Recent SEC enforcement actions have targeted ICOs and tokens deemed to have violated securities laws. Future Clarity Comprehensive Frameworks: As the crypto market evolves, regulatory agencies may introduce clearer guidelines for digital asset classification. Role of Congress: Legislative action could provide the definitive clarity that the SEC currently avoids. Conclusion Gary Gensler’s assertion that neither Bitcoin nor Ethereum has been officially labeled as securities by the SEC underscores their unique status in the cryptocurrency market. While regulatory uncertainty persists for many digital assets, Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to enjoy broad acceptance due to their decentralized nature and established market presence. As crypto regulations evolve, these flagship cryptocurrencies remain key pillars of the digital asset ecosystem. To learn more about the innovative startups shaping the future of the crypto industry, explore our article on latest news, where we delve into the most promising ventures and their potential to disrupt traditional industries. CoinOtag