2 hours ago
Considering that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler – the man many perceive as waging war on crypto – is set to resign on January 20 , there was some uncertainty about whether the watchdog would file its appeal to the summary judgment in the Ripple case by the deadline . On January 20, Gensler’s war on crypto ends at the SEC. We asked the SEC to agree to postpone the filing of their opening brief in their appeal of our victory (current deadline Jan 15) – and they refused. What a waste of time and taxpayer dollars! Nevertheless, we are confident… — Stuart Alderoty (@s_alderoty) January 14, 2025 Despite the many rumors the regulator would abandon the case under the imminent Trump administration, the SEC nonetheless filed its claim that the district court erred with its previous decision . Specifically, the Commission argues in its opening statement that the district court made a series of mistakes when it absolved Ripple Labs of most of the accusations, finding some grounds for the unregistered securities offering charges only in the case of institutional investors and fining the company $125 million – significantly less than the requested $2 billion. Why the SEC claims the previous ruling is wrong In a nutshell, the SEC claims that the court’s finding that XRP sold to retail investors does not fit the parameters provided by the Howey Test is incorrect as the introduced dichotomy between sophisticated – institutional – investors and unsophisticated – retail – investors does not make sense. Indeed, part of the ruling in Ripple’s favor is based on the notion that the general public could not have reasonably expected to make a profit as they could not have properly understood the situation due to the volume and diversity of promotional material related to XRP. The watchdog, for its part, claims that the investing public would have, without a doubt, grasped the essence of the message given Ripple’s focus on promising to boost demand for and liquidity of the token . Similarly, the regulator argues that, despite what the court found, a lack of knowledge about the actual origin of the received asset – who one is buying an asset from – does not negate the possibility an asset is part of an investment contract. Finally, with regard to XRP granted to employees of Ripple, the SEC claims that previous legislature and decisions show in no uncertain terms that goods and services – such as labor done for a company – constitute an investment under the Howey Test , thus invalidating the conclusion that a lack of money investment negates the possibility of an investment contract. Ripple Labs’ reacts to the SEC appeal Ripple Labs’ reaction to the appeal can best be described as exasperated. CEO Brad Garlinghouse, for example, made an X post saying that what the SEC is doing is one form of insanity. One definition of insanity…. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Gensler`s SEC really took this to heart. https://t.co/giV8GiW6qV — Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) January 16, 2025 Simultaneously, Ripple’s CLO Stuart Alderoty des c ribed the watchdog’s arguments as ‘already failed’ and added the incoming Trump administration would likely abandon the case. Furthermore, he shared the company’s short fact sheet about the case, once more highlighting that XRP itself is not claimed to be a security. Still, it is worth pointing out that the SEC’s appeal makes it clear, in no uncertain terms, that the case remains, at its essence, about unregistered security offerings as seen in copies of the statement such as the one provided by defense lawyer and former Federal prosecutor James K. Filan. From 2013 through 2020, defendants Ripple Labs, Inc., Christian A. Larsen (Ripple’s co-founder, former CEO, and current chairman), and Bradley Garlinghouse (Ripple’s current CEO) together offered and sold over $2 billion of the crypto asset XRP as investment contracts, a type of security. However, because these offers and sales were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, investors were deprived of the important disclosures that federal securities laws mandate when securities are offered and sold to the public. This left investors with only the inadequate information that Ripple unilaterally provided. XRP price reaction to the SEC appeal Finally, examining the cryptocurrency market itself, investors are either convinced that Ripple Labs’ defense is watertight or that the Trump administration is guaranteed to drop the charges. XRP appears to have completely escaped the grip of the legal battle – a legal battle that kept the token depressed through most of the 2024 bull market – and has recently reached a new market capitalization all-time high (ATH). XRP 30-day price chart. Source: Finbold Additionally, XRP is close to recording a new price ATH as it is, at press time on January 16, trading at $3.07 after an 18.74% rise in the last 30 days. Featured image via Shutterstock The post Ripple v. SEC case update: January 16, 2025 appeared first on Finbold .
Finbold
You can visit the page to read the article.
Source: Finbold
Tags :
Cryptocurrency news cryptocurrency Ripple Ripple vs SEC SEC XRP
Disclaimer: The opinion expressed here is not investment advice – it is provided for informational purposes only. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of BitMaden. Every investment and all trading involves risk, so you should always perform your own research prior to making decisions. We do not recommend investing money you cannot afford to lose.
XRP Explosion: Top 3 Bitcoin-Linked Cryptos Set for Sky-rocket-ing 15x Gains by 2025
By investing $750 in the right mix of altcoins, it’s possible to build a portfolio that could be worth $2 million by the time the next cycle peaks. Among the most promising digital assets areBitcoin, BigBossInu, Cardano (ADA), XRP, SEI, and TRON (TRX). Here’s why these five altcoins are primed for exponential growth and could help you achieve significant wealth in the years to come. BigBossInu: A Crypto Revolution Begins with Its High-Impact Presale BigBossInu is taking the crypto space by storm, with its presale generating massive interest from early adopters. Seen as a high-reward venture, those who get in early can seize this lucrative opportunity. With a surge in investor enthusiasm, BigBossInu is a top cryptocurrency to monitor. Backed by bold features and a future-focused roadmap, BigBossInu is primed for explosive growth. Those who invest early could see their initial $750 investment skyrocket, making BigBossInu a cornerstone of any growth-focused crypto portfolio. BigBossInu celebrates $100,000 raised within minutes! For a limited time, get a 50% EXTRA BONUS by using the code EXTRA50X. Don’t miss out! >>>>>> Cardano (ADA) Trading around $0.34 today, ADA continues to hold significant support at the $0.20 level, which could serve as a critical foundation for a recovery if the market outlook improves Ripple (XRP) continues to be a dominant force in cross-border payments, with Ripple’s technology providing a fast, cost-effective alternative to traditional banking systems. Ripple surged nearly 98% after Ripple’s partial victory against the SEC, reaching the fourth-largest cryptocurrency spot by market cap. Sei (SEI) hits record high amid bullish momentum. Sei (SEI) reached a new peak of $0.589 and is currently trading near $0.60. This strong performance is driven by its listings on major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, along with an increase in transactions. TRON (TRX) is a well-established blockchain platform known for its focus on decentralized content sharing and applications. Its growing popularity makes it an essential part of any well-diversified crypto portfolio aiming for big returns. >>> Conclusion For those looking to turn a $750 investment into a $2 million portfolio, these five altcoins BigBossInu, Cardano (ADA), XRP, SEI, and TRON (TRX) offer a compelling mix of growth potential, innovative technology, and strong market positioning. To learn more about BigBossInu and its Presale visit: Presale: https://bigbossinu.com/buy-token Website: https://bigbossinu.com Telegram: https://t.me/bigbossinu X/Twitter: https://x.com/BigBossInu Continue Reading: XRP Explosion: Top 3 Bitcoin-Linked Cryptos Set for Sky-rocket-ing 15x Gains by 2025 Finbold
Arkansas Senate Bill 60 Targets Crypto Mining Near Military Facilities
Arkansas Senate Bill 60 Targets Crypto Mining Near Military Facilities Arkansas Senate Bill 60 , co-sponsored by Senator Ricky Hill and House Speaker Brian Evans , seeks to prohibit digital-asset mining operations within a 30-mile radius of U.S. military facilities , according to AMP . This proposal has sparked debate, particularly around its implications for a crypto mine near Little Rock Air Force Base in Cabot , owned by Interstate Holdings . Local residents and officials have raised concerns about noise pollution and national security risks , prompting the legislative response. However, Interstate Holdings has pushed back, asserting its compliance with all regulations and distancing itself from any foreign ties, particularly China . Key Provisions of Senate Bill 60 1. Prohibition on Mining Near Military Bases Restriction Zone: The bill bans crypto mining activities within 30 miles of U.S. military facilities to mitigate potential risks. Focus on Cabot: The proposed legislation specifically targets a mining operation near the Little Rock Air Force Base . 2. Rationale for the Ban Noise Pollution: Residents near mining sites have complained about excessive noise generated by mining rigs. National Security: Lawmakers express concerns about the potential for foreign influence or espionage through mining activities. Controversy Surrounding the Cabot Crypto Mine Local Backlash Noise Concerns: Residents near the Interstate Holdings mine have voiced frustration over constant noise from mining rigs, disrupting their daily lives. Security Fears: Critics argue that the proximity of a crypto mine to a military facility could pose security vulnerabilities. Interstate Holdings’ Response Regulatory Compliance: The company emphasizes that it complies fully with state and federal regulations governing crypto mining. Denial of Foreign Ties: Interstate Holdings has confirmed it has no affiliations with China or any foreign entities, countering claims of national security risks. Implications of Senate Bill 60 1. For Crypto Mining Companies Increased Restrictions: Mining operators in Arkansas may face heightened scrutiny and geographic limitations. Operational Challenges: Companies near military facilities may need to relocate or cease operations, incurring significant costs. 2. For Local Communities Reduced Noise Pollution: If passed, the bill could alleviate noise issues for residents living near mining facilities. Economic Impact: The relocation of mining operations could result in job losses and reduced local investment. 3. For National Security Stronger Protections: The bill aims to enhance security measures around critical military infrastructure. Broader Precedent: This legislation could inspire similar measures in other states to regulate crypto mining near sensitive locations. Comparative Analysis: Crypto Mining Regulations Country/Region Policy on Crypto Mining Near Military Facilities United States (Arkansas) Proposed 30-mile restriction under Senate Bill 60. China Bans crypto mining entirely, citing energy use and security concerns. Kazakhstan Regulates mining activities with focus on energy and compliance zones. Canada Encourages mining but limits operations near sensitive infrastructure. Challenges and Criticisms of the Bill 1. Economic Consequences Relocation Costs: Mining companies may incur significant costs to relocate their facilities outside restricted zones. Job Losses: Local economies that rely on mining operations could face job losses and reduced tax revenue. 2. Enforcement Difficulties Defining Proximity: Determining exact boundaries for restricted zones may create enforcement challenges. Compliance Monitoring: Ensuring compliance with the ban will require additional resources and oversight. 3. Industry Pushback Reputation Risks: Mining companies like Interstate Holdings argue that unfounded allegations can harm their credibility and deter investment. Conclusion Arkansas Senate Bill 60 represents a significant effort to address the intersection of cryptocurrency mining and national security concerns . By proposing a 30-mile restriction around military facilities , lawmakers aim to protect sensitive infrastructure while addressing local grievances like noise pollution . However, the bill’s economic and operational implications for the crypto industry remain contentious. As the legislation progresses, it could set a precedent for how other states and countries manage the risks associated with cryptocurrency mining near critical facilities. To learn more about the innovative startups shaping the future of the crypto industry, explore our article on latest news , where we delve into the most promising ventures and their potential to disrupt traditional industries. Finbold
See Also
BTC
-
Analyst Predicts Bitcoin to Reach $160K in 2025
15 dakika önce
